Terranova v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.*
The plaintiff was injured when she drove into the side of a freight train that was standing across a city street. The trial court granted summary judgment against the plaintiff, holding that the only duty the railroad owed was to warn her that the crossing was blocked. The Court of Appeals, Division 2, affirmed. We vacate the opinion of the court of appeals and reverse the order of the trial court granting summary judgment. We hold that giving an adequate warning that a crossing is blocked will not, under every circumstance, discharge the railroad from liability. Instead,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
- DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ricardo Trevino v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990