Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1971No. Civ. 28038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

By deed, dated April 11, 1903, Susanna H. Van Nuys (“Grantor”), in consideration of love and affection, conveyed to her daughter, Annis H. Van Nuys (“Life Tenant”), certain real property situated in the City and County of San Francisco. The habendum clause of the deed provides as follows:

“To have and to hold the said property unto the said party of the second part for and during the term of his [rzc] natural life with remainder over upon the termination of said life estate to the issue of her body in equal shares. In the event of the death of said grantee without issue, then…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. San Francisco Presbyterian Orphanage & Farm v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Hernandez v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API