Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1993No. F018760PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DIBIASO, Acting P. J.

The Regents of the University of California (Regents) appeal from an order of the probate court which rejected their claim to the remainder of a testamentary trust. We will reverse. We will apply the common law preference for early vesting and hold that, absent evidence of the testator’s intent to the contrary, the identity of “heirs” entitled to trust assets must be determined at the date of death of the named ancestor who predeceased the life tenant, not at the date of death of the life tenant.

Statement of Case and Facts

Harold Evans Woodworth died testate in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. San Francisco Presbyterian Orphanage & Farm v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API