Legal Opinion

Tanzer v. Huffines

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 22, 1970No. Civ. A. 3166PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff is a stockholder of the B.S.F. Company (BSF), a Delaware corporation registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seq. (the Act) since September 26, 1962, as a non-diversified closed-end management investment company. She brings this action derivatively for BSF and double derivatively for Wright Machine Corporation (Wright), a wholly owned Massachusetts subsidiary of BSF. Defendants Huffines, Krock, and Muscat are individuals, and defendant Defiance Industries, Inc. (Defiance) is a corporation existing under the laws…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers BurginCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  3. Susan Tannenbaum v. Robert G. ZellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. In Re Frank J. Evangelist, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Strougo Ex Rel. Brazil Fund, Inc. v. Scudder, Stevens & Clark, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API