Legal Opinion

Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers Burgin

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 23, 1971No. 7745_1PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Moses, a shareholder of Fidelity Fund, Inc. (Fund), a Massachusetts-incorporated investment company, in December 1967 filed a complaint, and in November 1968 an amended complaint, in this derivative action. Fund is an open-end mutual fund, registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-l et seq. Defendants, in addition to Fund, are Fidelity Management and Research Company (Management), Fund’s investment adviser; The Crosby Corporation (Crosby), a wholly owned subsidiary of Management and sometimes included within that term, an underwriter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  3. Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. FleschnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API