Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Montes

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 27, 2004No. 3:04 CV 0295(WWE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

[DOC. # 8]

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

On May 21, 2004, this Court granted plaintiffs motion for default against defendant, Wilson Montes, whom plaintiff alleged had purchased and utilized a pirate access device to intercept satellite television programming services without authority and without payment to plaintiff. Plaintiff now moves for the entry of a default judgment. Defendant has neither responded to this motion nor moved to set aside the default.

For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion will be granted and judgment will enter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. International Cablevision, Inc. D/B/A Adelphia Cable v. John Sykes and Marvin NoelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DirecTV v. HaskellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  2. Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. FREZZADistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API