Legal Opinion
DirecTV v. Haskell
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 15, 2004No. CV-04-53-B-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS I AND II OF THE COMPLAINT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before this Court are Plaintiff DirecTV, Inc.’s request for damages under the Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 605(a), and its Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of the Complaint brought against Defendant David Haskell for the purchase, acquisition, employment, and use of a satellite pirating device. This Court GRANTS DirecTV’s Motion to Dismiss with prejudice Counts I and II of the Complaint, and, pursuant to Count III,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Goldman, Antonetti, Ferraiuoli, Axtmayer & Hertell, a Partnership v. Medfit International, Inc., Hector RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Cablevision of Southern Connecticut, Ltd. Partnership v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- DirecTV, Inc. v. KaasDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. HamiltonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DIRECTV, INC. v. WalshDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008