Legal Opinion

Miners Savings Bank v. Walsh Et Ux

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1942No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is an attempt by the Miners Savings Bank of Pittston, assignee of Dime Bank and Trust Company of Pittston, to retry in an action of assumpsit certain issues which were tided and determined against its assignor in an action of ejectment, See Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. Walsh, 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 189, 17 A. 2d 728.

In that case we affirmed the judgment of the court below, entered in' the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County to No. 648 May Term, 1939, holding that the plaintiff, which on May 12, 1931 had lent the defendants $2600, taking as security for said loan a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Naffah v. City Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Shotkin v. Presbyterian Church Board of PensionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Dime Bk. Tr. Co. v. Walsh Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Kiely v. J. A. Cunningham Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API