Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. C.F. White Family Partnership v. Roldan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 2008No. SC 89148PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Chief Justice.

Respondent, the Honorable Marco Rol-dan, held that because the parties to the underlying condemnation action filed exceptions to the commissioners’ report of damages, he w’ould not determine whether the property qualified for an award of heritage value as an element of just compensation under section 523.061,1 pending the jury’s determination of damages pursuant to the exceptions. Relators petitioned this Court to direct Respondent to determine heritage value prior to the jury trial on exceptions. This Court issued its preliminary writ.

*571Missouri statutes do…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. RainsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Parktown Imports, Inc. v. Audi of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Akins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. St. Louis County v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. Unnerstall Ex Rel. Leighton v. BerkemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Nothum v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API