Legal Opinion

Dake v. Tuell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 2, 1985No. 66541PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether discharged at will employees can maintain a suit for wrongful discharge against their former employers by cloaking their claims in the misty shroud of prima facie tort. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ petitions for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

Defendants Eldon Tuell and Robin Hubbard are the owners of a Lowrey Organ Center where plaintiffs were employed. Plaintiff Dake was employed as a manager and plaintiff Fausett as an organ instructor. In June of 1982, plaintiffs were fired after informing defendants that other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Hansome v. Northwestern Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Arie v. Intertherm, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Amaan v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. Lundberg v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Johnson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Rice v. HodappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API