Legal Opinion

Amaan v. City of Eureka

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 6, 1981No. 61336PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARDGETT, Chief Justice.

The issue on this appeal is whether § 79.240, RSMo 1978, 1 which authorizes the mayor of a city of the fourth class, with the consent of the majority of the board of aldermen, to remove at will an appointive officer of the city violates the constitutional rights of respondents contrary to the provisions of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment of U.S. Constitution, and Mo.Const. Art. 1, § 2, where, as here, respondents-policemen were dismissed from their employment in accordance with § 79.240.

The circuit court held § 79.240 denied respondents…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Dake v. TuellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Hansome v. Northwestern Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Arie v. Intertherm, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Margiotta v. Christian Hospital Northeast NorthwestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API