Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Banks

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 14, 1979No. ACM 22423PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ORSER, Judge.

The accused was convicted, consonant with his pleas, of one specification of willfully destroying military property of the United States by applying glue to a drag parachute bag and a pilot parachute,1 (Charge I and its specification) and, by that same act and despite pleas of not guilty, one specification of sabotage, i. e., attempting to willfully damage an RF-4C aircraft with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense of the United States.2 (Charge II and its specification). The approved sentence is confinement at hard labor for eighteen months,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. KueflerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. McGeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. KabatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. PlatteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. CagleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API