Legal Opinion

H. A. Metz Laboratories, Inc. v. Blackman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

This is an action for an injunction to restrain a trade-mark infringement and unfair competition and also for an accounting. The following allegations are contained in the complaint:

Plaintiff and its predecessors for the past thirty-six years have been selling a certain drug known in the pharmacopoeia as amidopyrine, and used for the treatment and alleviation of headache, neuralgia, colds, influenza, rheumatism and other ailments, under the trademark “ Pyramidon.” Said trade-mark was duly registered in the United States Patent Office under registration number 32214 in the year 1898 and in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  3. Witthaus v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. Eiseman v. SchifferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  5. Bennett v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Tas-T-Nut Company v. Variety Nut & Date CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. Omag Optik Und Mechanik A. G. v. WeinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Metropolitan Artists, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API