Legal Opinion

Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The plaintiffs are the manufacturers of Lifebuoy health soap. The defendant Eavenson manufactures a number of brands of “ health soap,” red in color and carbolic in odor. The defendant R. C. Williams & Co., Inc., sells one of these brands. (Reference hereinafter to “ defendant ” means the manufacturer, Eavenson.) The plaintiff establishes as a fact the use for almost forty years of a collocation of various features with reference to Lifebuoy soap. This collocation embodies red color, carbolic odor and octagonal shape. By the expenditure of large sums of money in advertising and sales…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Fischer v. . BlankNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. American Chain Co. v. Carr Chain Works, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Adolf J. Mainzer, Inc. v. GruberthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lucien Lelong v. George W. Button CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  2. Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United Whelan Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Lever Bros. v. J. Eavenson & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API