Brooks v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant was found guilty by a jury of the offense of vagrancy.
The complaint filed by the solicitor alleged that within twelve months before the commencement of this proceeding the defendant was a vagrant, against the peace and dignity of the State.
The complaint was in code form, and sufficient. The demurrers thereto were properly overruled. Section 437, Title 14, Code of Alabama 1940; Hill v. State, 23 Ala.App. 451, 127 So. 791; Hallmark v. State, 28 Ala.App. 416, 185 So. 908.
The evidence introduced by the State in the trial below was substantially as follows :
Houston…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lang v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hallmark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
- Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broughton v. BrewerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1969
- Hall v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953