Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1952No. 6 Div. 266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Recorder’s Court for the offense of vagrancy, in violation of Section 1444 of the General City Code of Birmingham of 1944, as amended by ordinance 589F.

On appeal to the circuit court a complaint was filed by the City attorney charging the-defendant with the offense of being a vagrant, contrary to and in violation- of said ordinance.

*591The cause was tried by the court without ¡a jury, and was submitted by agreement of the parties on the typewritten record of the trial in the Recorder’s Court. The court adjudged defendant guilty and assessed a fine of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Snitzer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Reed v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McConnell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Hall v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API