Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1930No. 8 Div. 14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The defendant was indicted on the blanket charge of being a vagrant, which embraces the thirteen definitions embraced in section 5571 of the Code of 1923. In order to sustain a conviction, some one of these thirteen definitions must be proven by evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt.

To prove tbis, it was competent for the state to prove that defendant was seen strolling around the streets of Florence day and night; that she had no known legitimate business; that she was apparently able to work; that she was a young woman under middle age; that she lived alone, and that men, both married and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Charles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API