Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Deitz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1968No. B-738PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

The question to be decided here is whether Article 5537,1 which suspends the statute of limitations while the defendant is “without the limits of this State,” applies in a case where substituted service of process is available under the provisions of Article 2039a. We hold that it does.

There is no dispute as to any of the material facts. Suit was instituted by John Deitz and wife against Virgil A. Vaughn and wife to recover damages arising out of an automobile collision. The collision occurred on January 11, 1964, and the suit was filed on January 18, 1966. Both plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ashley v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. G. D. Searle & Co. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kerlin v. SaucedaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Beckmire v. Ristokrat Clay Products Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API