Legal Opinion

United States v. General Herman Andrews

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1981No. 80-1753PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted defendant General Herman Andrews on one count of interstate transportation of stolen goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. In this appeal, the defendant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence and claims that an instruction given by the district court 1 was prejudicial error. We affirm the jury verdict.

I

We, of course, view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury verdict. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 469, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). With that standard in mind, the record suggests the following summary of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Jimmy Floyd Sewell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Clarence Edward NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Preston H. Williams, United States of America v. Frankie Bell DurenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Thomas Robert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Aaron BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Martin G. ThunaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API