Legal Opinion

Jimmy Floyd Sewell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1969No. 19284PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Jimmy Floyd Sewell was jointly indicted but separately tried and convicted by a jury of a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. Sewell’s companions in the offense pleaded guilty to the identical charge, were sentenced, and testified at Sewell’s trial.

On appeal Sewell contends: (1) his arrest was invalid because the arresting officer lacked probable cause to make the arrest, and (2) the instructions given by the District Court on aiding and abetting in the commission of a crime, and on possession and, in particular possession of recently stolen property,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Thomas Eugene Barfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  2. Klingler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API