Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Edward Neville
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1975No. 74-1708PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, Chief Judge.
Defendant Clarence Edward Neville appeals his jury convictions on seven counts for violations of the Dyer Act. 1 He was sentenced by the District Court 2 to concurrent terms of five years in prison on counts 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 and to five years imprisonment on counts 2 and 4, consecutive to the other counts but concurrent with each other, for an aggregate of ten years, and fined $35,000.
On appeal the defendant challenges (1) the court’s instruction permitting the jury to convict him for knowingly transporting rebuilt trucks containing undefined “major parts” of stolen…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. FregosoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John Henry Butera, Robert Andrew DenomaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Kenneth VottellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Oscar CivelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Maynard John VerdoornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.