Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1975No. 36592PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant Royce Arnold appeals his conviction and five year sentence for stealing from a dwelling house. Defendant maintains that an in-court identification of defendant by a prosecution witness was based on an unduly suggestive lineup and was therefore improper. We disagree and affirm the conviction.

The State’s key witness to the crime was Kenneth Churchill. Mr. Churchill testified that in midmorning he observed the defendant, who was wearing a dark brown jacket and trousers similar to those worn by a service station attendant, park his car across the street from Mr. Churchill’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. State v. RutledgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. GormonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. ProctorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. TerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. HollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API