Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This opinion addresses two questions involving limitations in the context of the law of products liability-occupational disease. The questions have been certified to us by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Md.Code (1974, 1984 Repl.Vol.), §§ 12-601 to -609 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (Courts Article). The first question essentially asks how § 58 of the Maryland workers’ compensation act affects limitations. Md. Code (1957, 1979 Repl.Vol., 1984 Cum.Supp.), Art. 101, § 58…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- American Bonding Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.