Wehe v. McLaughlin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant (plaintiff below) was at all times herein mentioned a married man residing in the state of California, where he was engaged in the practice of his profession as a lawyer. Upon the assumption that such was their right, he and his wife made separate returns for the year 1920, each returning one-half of plaintiff’s professional earnings. The Department, taking the view that the whole of the income was returnable by the plaintiff alone, made an additional assessment against him of $495.38, which he paid under protest, and to recover this amount he brought the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In re the Estate of WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1916
- Blair v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dickey v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Leydig v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Brunton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Bingham v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
- United States v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.