Legal Opinion

Wehe v. McLaughlin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 5538PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant (plaintiff below) was at all times herein mentioned a married man residing in the state of California, where he was engaged in the practice of his profession as a lawyer. Upon the assumption that such was their right, he and his wife made separate returns for the year 1920, each returning one-half of plaintiff’s professional earnings. The Department, taking the view that the whole of the income was returnable by the plaintiff alone, made an additional assessment against him of $495.38, which he paid under protest, and to recover this amount he brought the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. In re the Estate of WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Blair v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dickey v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Leydig v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Brunton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. Bingham v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929
  5. United States v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API