Leydig v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. He and his wife made separate returns for 1918 and 1920, of a half royalty interest under two oil and gas leases. The Commissioner found a deficiency because he was taxable for both interests. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the tax only under the second lease and reduced the amount to $13,407.98. That decision is in controversy.
The facts as found by the Board are as follows: The petitioner is an individual residing at Newton, Kan. Grace Leydig is his wife. They were married some time prior to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Reynolds v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Alexander v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.