Legal Opinion

Leydig v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1930No. 230PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. He and his wife made separate returns for 1918 and 1920, of a half royalty interest under two oil and gas leases. The Commissioner found a deficiency because he was taxable for both interests. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the tax only under the second lease and reduced the amount to $13,407.98. That decision is in controversy.

The facts as found by the Board are as follows: The petitioner is an individual residing at Newton, Kan. Grace Leydig is his wife. They were married some time prior to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Lathrop v. EyestoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Reynolds v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Alexander v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API