Legal Opinion

Blair v. Roth

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1927No. 5183PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (44 Stat. 105, 110 [26 USCA §§ 1226, 1227]). During the year 1921 the appellee, Wm. A. Roth, and Edith M. Roth, his wife, were residents of California and were severally in the employ of the Los Angeles Lime Company. The latter’s salary was $5,309.90 and that of the appellee substantially greater. In his individual income tax return for that year appellee reported, with other items, his personal salary, but not that of his wife, and in a separate return she reported her salary. Upon auditing the-re turns,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wren v. WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fennell v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  2. Hammonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Helvering v. HickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Wehe v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API