Legal Opinion

Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1929No. Docket No. 5907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered against it for $2,341.03 as damages suffered by reason of a temporary restraining order and injunction pendente lite issued in a certain action entitled Butters et al. v. City of Oakland, a Municipal Corporation, et al., wherein the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (a corporation), as surety, executed undertakings in the sum of $450 upon the restraining order and in the sum of $2,000 upon the injunction pendente lite.

Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc., plaintiff and respondent herein, were awarded a contract…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kendall v. FoulksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Butters v. City of OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Clark v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Carroll v. McPikeMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trickey v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Jennings v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Brown v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Allen v. PitchessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. William C. Cornell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API