Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Harriman Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 10, 1936No. 350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Henry E. Oppenheimer, was a depositor in the Harriman National Bank, of which Joseph W. Harriman was president and F. S. Williamson was a vice president. On October 28, 1930, Williamson called upon Oppenheimer, presenting a letter of introduction on bank stationery signed by Harriman. Relying upon statements made in the letter and oral statements made by Williamson, Oppenheimer was induced to purchase ten shares of stock of the bank at the price of $15,120. On November 1, he received from the bank a bill therefor which he paid by a check drawn upon his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lantry v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. National Bank & Loan Co. v. PetrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. McClure v. . Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stirling Homex Corporation v. RaichleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. In Re MeiselmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Jezarian v. RaichleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. MacLeod v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API