Legal Opinion
Department of Education v. Carl D.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1983No. Nos. 81-4209, 81-4262PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated actions arose under the Education For All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1461 (1976) (EAHCA). The district court held in both cases that the limitations period applicable to civil actions brought under section 1415(e)(2) of the EAHCA for review of a state hearing officer’s administrative decision is the thirty-day period of the Hawaii Administrative Procedures Act, Hawaii Rev.Stat. § 91-14 (1976 & Supp.1981). Two suits by the Hawaii Department of Education challenging adverse hearing officer decisions were therefore dismissed as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Monahan v. State of Neb.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
- Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joseph Spiegler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Mauricio and Dina Scokin, Individually and as Next Friend of Davina Scokin, a Minor v. The State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Richard Amann v. Town of StowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Adler v. Education Department of State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Bow School District v. Quentin W.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.