Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Hammer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1920No. 10,284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Marion Superior Court (.105,692) ; Vincent G. Clifford, Judge. Action by Ralph W. Hammer against Vernon C. Griffith and another. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

This is an action by appellee to recover damages for a breach of an alleged contract by which it is claimed appellants employed appellee to work for them as a traveling salesman for one year, beginning January 1, 1916. Appellee began working for appellants January 3, and was discharged January 12, 1916. There was a trial by jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee.

1. Section 5, Acts 1917 p. 526, §691e Burns’ Supp. 1918, requiring a memorandum to be attached to motions does not apply to a motion for a new trial. Wilson v. Sentman (1919), 74 Ind. App. -, 121 N. E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. HowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Shumate v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wilson v. SentmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indiana State Toll Bridge Commission v. MinorIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API