Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Mayfield
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 1990No. 88-CA-1773PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, William Dunn, appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees. Appellant advances two assignments of error:
“I. The trial court erred in granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment in ruling that plaintiff-appellant was raising new conditions on his court appeal in his workers’ compensation claim as no new issues or conditions are being raised on appeal.
“II. The trial court erred in granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment when the court ruled that plaintiff-appellant’s workers’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Ryan v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Szymanski v. Halle's Department StoreOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Buckeye International, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Peeples v. Farley Paving Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- Ward v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Reed v. MTD Products, Inc., Midwest IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Jackson v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.