Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Peeples v. Farley Paving Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1981No. 80-1635PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has held on numerous occasions that mandamus will not lie where there is some evidence to support the findings of the Industrial Commission. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Mees, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 128; State, ex rel. Ruggles, v. Stebbins (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 228. There was evidence before the commission to support the finding that the appellant had no psychiatric condition resulting from his earlier industrial injury. Both the report of Dr. Altman, the examining psychiatrist, and the report of Dr. Cordell, the non-examining psychologist, indicate that appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Ruggles v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Questor Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dunn v. MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Buckeye International, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API