Heiskell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from an order revoking probation.
On original submission, appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief which set forth no contentions. The record did not reflect that appellant was served with counsel’s brief, that appellant was given an opportunity to examine the appellate record, or that appellant was advised of his right to file a pro se brief and given an opportunity to do so. For failure to comply with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, the appeal was abated in a per curiam opinion. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McClintick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte BattenfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Guster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kelly, SylvesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
- Kuyava v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.