Guster v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
These are appeals from convictions for burglary with intent to commit theft and felony theft. The appellant pled guilty and the court sentenced him to seven years for each offense.
Appellant’s only ground of error is that the trial court failed to comply with Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., when ac*495cepting his pleas of guilty.1 There is no showing that appellant was prejudiced or injured by the failure of the trial court to fully comply with that article. Cf. Ex parte Taylor, Tex.Cr.App., 522 S.W.2d 479 (1975). Accordingly, this contention could not be raised on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Crocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Ex Parte McAteeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Shepherd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.