Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. BF Goodrich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1992No. 72080Published

1DissentAlma Wilson, Justice

If we are to be fair and consistent in our application of the workers’ compensation law, the parties in this cause must be afforded 1) notice of the competency and probative value of the medical evidence and 2) opportunity to stand on the evidence adduced or to supplement the evidence. In this cause both the claimant and the employer offered medical reports to be admitted into evidence. Objections to the competency and probative value of each medical report were made at trial. The judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court admitted the medical reports, taking the objections under advisement.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Gaines v. Sun Refinery and MarketingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. LaBarge v. ZebcoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API