Legal Opinion

Paselli v. Utley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1938No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 40,198PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

On August 16,1935, plaintiff suffered an injury to bis left eye while in tbe employ of defendant company, and under an approved agreement, compensation was paid to bim until October 28,1935, at wbicb time be returned to work and continued to be employed until a certain job was completed, approximately six weeks later. On No vember 6, 1935, defendants filed petition to stop compensation. After hearing, however, the deputy-commissioner entered an award giving plaintiff compensation for the specific loss of his eye.

Defendants appealed, and upon review the department reversed the award of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Luyk v. HertelMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Tews v. C. F. Hanks Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Thomas v. Parker Rust Proof Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Paselli v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People of Michigan v. William LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Papazian v. Goldberg (In Re Mardigian Estate)Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Turner v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API