Legal Opinion
Pehr v. Rubbermaid, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 10, 2000No. 99-2089-JWLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
On March 1,1999, plaintiff filed this patent infringement action, claiming that defendant Rubbermaid’s distribution and sale of a latch closure mechanism used on particular models of its Action Packer® containers infringed certain claims of United States Patents Nos. 4,925,041 (the “’041 patent”) and 5,137,260 (the “’260 patent”). Rubbermaid counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of the ’041 and ’260 patents. On March 8, 2000, this court granted defendant Rubbermaid’s motion for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dan Cantrell and Larry Holt v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 2021Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Zeran v. Diamond Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Green Construction Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Battenfeld of America Holding Co. v. Baird, Kurtz & DobsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Crandall v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Chaves v. Ruhland (In re Ruhland)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC. v. Tricam Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019