Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Foster's Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1942No. Civ. 11814PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants, rendered by the court sitting without a jury, in a personal injury action based upon their alleged negligence in failing to maintain the doors of a sidewalk elevator in a condition to comply with section 238 of the San Francisco Building Laws known as Ordinance 1008 (New Series).
The plaintiff alleged that she slipped, fell and was injured while walking over said sidewalk elevator, negligently maintained, in front of defendants ’ place of business. The sidewalk in which said elevator was installed slopes slightly from west to east, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gallichotte v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ackers v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Graves v. RomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Robson v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.