Legal Opinion
Barrett v. City of Claremont
California Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1953No. L. A. 22543Published
1Opinion of the Court
41 Cal.2d 70 (1953)
MARY E. BARRETT, Respondent,
v.
THE CITY OF CLAREMONT, Appellant.
L. A. No. 22543.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
May 19, 1953.
Moss, Lyon & Dunn, Sidney A. Moss and Henry F. Walker for Appellant.
Knight, Gitelson, Ashton & Hagenbaugh, Van Hagenbaugh and Leon J. Alexander for Respondent.
EDMONDS, J.
Mary E. Barrett sued the city of Claremont for damages, charging the defendant with negligence in the construction and maintenance of a public sidewalk. The injuries which she sustained resulted from a fall occurring when she tripped upon a ridge of asphaltum filler material…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.