Legal Opinion
Van Sickle v. Keck
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1938No. 4359PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRICE, Justice.
The appellant sued the appellees for an interest in, and to impress an equitable lien against, certain real estate situated in Lincoln County, New Mexico.
The appellant will be styled plaintiff; the defendant Keck, defendant, and the other defendants styled defendant Woolard and defendant Franklin, respectively.
Plaintiff alleged in substance that in 1931 he entered into an oral agreement with the defendant and his wife, by the terms of which he was to furnish labor, material and money, sufficient to build a house for defendant on certain lots described; in consideration for…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- White v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rose Realty, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Fuqua v. TregoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. KeithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Wagner v. Pruett (In re Vaughan Co., Realtors)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.