Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rose Realty, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1968No. 8549PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This action by the plaintiff was to recover judgment on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The action was filed January 19, 1966. A copy of the complaint with copies of the note, mortgage and assignment to it attached as exhibits was immediately served upon the defendant. The defendant, Rose Realty, Inc., a corporation, being a subsequent mortgagee, on January 24, 1966, served the plaintiff with a request for admissions to be answered within 10 days that the note had been paid when refinanced by other defendants. The request was not denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Robinson v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Van Sickle v. KeckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lockhart v. LeedsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Badaracco v. BadaraccoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Durham v. GuestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Farmers, Inc. v. Dal MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Slade v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Corliss v. CorlissNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API