Legal Opinion
Fuqua v. Trego
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1943No. 4737PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MABRY, Justice.
Defendant, the City Drug Store of Clayton, New Mexico, operating as a partnership in which plaintiffs-appellees, Fuqua, Murphy and Trego, had an interest, became insolvent and upon petition of the said owners a receiver was appointed by' the District Court of Union county on July 14, 1941. Thereafter under a second amended complaint filed on behalf of the said Fuqua and Murphy and against the said Wilbur Trego and Carmyne Trego, the plaintiffs under said amended complaint, claimed a separate indebtedness of $1,500 owing to each of the two from the said defendants, this being on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wooley v. Shell Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Continental Life Ins. Co. v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Norment v. TurleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. Armstrong & ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hoge v. Farmers Market & Supply Co. of Las Cruces, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Everett v. GillilandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Permian Basin Investment Corporation v. LloydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Birtrong v. Coronado Building Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Hill v. District Court of Eighth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.