Welch v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was indicted for perjury. The verdict grew out of a murder trial in which he testified for the defendant. There was another witness named Miller who testified in the murder trial to the same facts substantially, if not exactly. It seems from the record that Miller was also indicted for perjury. During his trial appellant offered Miller as a witness, but on objection of the State, he was not permitted to testify, the assigned reason being that he was indicted for the same offense, or for a matter growing out of the same offense. Substantially, this phase of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- O'Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. BenningsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- People v. PahrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.