K-Mart Corp. v. Honeycutt
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this negligence case, we decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by excluding the plaintiffs’ human factors and safety expert. The court of appeals held that it did. Honeycutt v. K-Mart, 1 S.W.3d 239 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1999). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the expert because none of his opinions would assist the trier-of-fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact issue. We therefore reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment that the Honeycutts take nothing from K-Mart.
Lisa Honeycutt injured her back…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Bradley v. State Ex Rel. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by254 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- FFE Transportation Services, Inc. v. FulghamTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- in Re Commitment of Michael BohannanTexas Supreme Court · 2012
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.