Legal Opinion
United States v. Arnett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 2003No. Nos. 00-10170, 00-30189; D.C. Nos. CR-95-05287-REC (Eastern District of California), CR-95-60120-1-HO (District of Oregon)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Timothy Wayne Arnett appeals pro se his conviction of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), for seven armed bank robberies that occurred in California and another in Oregon.1 Arnett argues that his convictions should be reversed as a result of a multitude of individual errors, or as a result of their cumulative effect. In a separate published opinion filed contemporaneously with this disposition, we address Arnett’s argument that the district court erred in applying…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- William J. Jones v. M.L. Smith, Warden Attorney General State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MeloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Arnett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004