Legal Opinion

William J. Jones v. M.L. Smith, Warden Attorney General State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 2001No. 99-56405PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

In this habeas corpus case we confront the question of whether, as of January 14, 1992, the omission of a premeditation charge from a state court attempted murder information combined with its inclusion in the jury instructions constituted a variance or an amendment to the information. We hold that because premeditation was a sentence enhancing provision under California law on the date Petitioner’s conviction became final, the discrepancy between the information and jury instructions was a variance subject to harmless error review. Since Petitioner had…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Washington, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. John Angus Wright v. Sec. For the Dept. of Correc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Sean Lamar Sanders, A/K/A Sean Lamont SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API