Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Felton
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 1, 2011No. CC 07C18859; CA A139059; SC S058311; CC 06C14844; CA A134157; SC S058373; CA A128108; SC S058327PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*595DE MUNIZ, C. J.
These three cases, which we have consolidated for purposes of argument and opinion, involve one administrative rule challenge (ORS 183.400) and two mandamus actions (ORS 34.110) brought by two prison inmates, each convicted of aggravated murder that he .committed when he was less than 17 years of age.1
In the rule challenge brought by petitioner Sopher, he contends that the board exceeded its statutory authority when it promulgated administrative rules (the juvenile aggravated murder, or JAM, rules) that provide for a parole review hearing (rather than a parole hearing for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EngweilerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Engweiler v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Nay v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Kennedy v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.