State v. Ross
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
560 Submitted on the briefs January 4, peremptory writ of mandamus to issue February 25, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. MICHAEL STUART ROSS, Defendant-Relator. (CC 18CR32198; 19CR45558) (SC S067936)
481 P3d 1286
In relator’s criminal case, the trial court held that, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana,
590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390,
206 L Ed 2d 583
(2020), the jury should be instructed that unanimity is necessary for either a guilty or a not-guilty verdict. Relator filed a mandamus petition in the Supreme Court, arguing that Ramos did not affect the constitutionality of Oregon laws…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. UleryOregon Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DippreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. MartineauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. WaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.