Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2021No. S067936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

560 Submitted on the briefs January 4, peremptory writ of mandamus to issue February 25, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. MICHAEL STUART ROSS, Defendant-Relator. (CC 18CR32198; 19CR45558) (SC S067936)

481 P3d 1286

In relator’s criminal case, the trial court held that, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana,

590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390,

206 L Ed 2d 583

(2020), the jury should be instructed that unanimity is necessary for either a guilty or a not-guilty verdict. Relator filed a mandamus petition in the Supreme Court, arguing that Ramos did not affect the constitutionality of Oregon laws…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. UleryOregon Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DippreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. MartineauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. WaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API