Legal Opinion · Dissent

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, Lp v. Ratner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2014No. S13G1723Published

1DissentHunstein, Justice

I must respectfully dissent.

1. The majority’s analysis affords insufficient deference to the trial court’s determination on class certification in this case. As this Court has noted, “trial judges have broad discretion in deciding whether to certify a class.” Carnett’s, Inc. v. Hammond, 279 Ga. 125, 127 (3) (610 SE2d 529) (2005); see also Jones v. Douglas County, 262 Ga. 317, 323 (2) (418 SE2d 19) (1992) (“[o]n appellate review ... ‘the discretion of the trial judge in certifying or refusing to certify a class action is to be respected in all cases where not abused’ ”). “ ‘Implicit in this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Carnett's, Inc. v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Jones v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Brenntag Mid South, Inc. v. SmartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Jackson v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API