Legal Opinion

Brenntag Mid South, Inc. v. Smart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 2011No. A10A1654PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Brenntag Mid South, Inc. appeals the trial court’s order certifying an “inconvenience/evacuation class” in an action filed by Louise Smart, Emma Lou Stokes and Turista Elmore (the “Plaintiffs”).

This action arose out of the accidental release of a cloud of glacial acetic acid from a chemical storage tank at Brenntag’s facility in East Point, Georgia, on December 15, 2004 and the subsequent evacuation of area residents by governmental authorities. The Plaintiffs allege that a Brenntag employee caused the release by connecting a steam delivery line to the tank containing the acid…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Vega v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Charles J. Piazza, Jr. v. EBSCO Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Resource Life Insurance Co. v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, Lp v. RatnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. RITE AID OF GEORGIA, INC. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. American Debt Foundation, Inc. v. HodzicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Suntrust Bank v. BickerstaffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API